The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error and the misapprehension of the legal principle) is a fact that the defendant sent to the court, but it cannot be deemed that it is about the public interest.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the grounds that Article 310 of the Criminal Act is applied to the facts charged of defamation of this case and the illegality thereof is removed is erroneous.

2. Determination

A. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person running D in Dong-gu Daejeon and a member of the Daejeon Provincial Council of the Daejeon Provincial Council of Korea.

On February 2013, the Defendant printed the F Office located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Seoul: “The Defendant was subject to a warning disposition on August 10, 2011 at the Sungdong-gu Office, and thereafter was assumed to be subject to a fine for negligence by the Ministry of Health and Welfare ( August 24, 2011, the Defendant: “The Defendant was aware that the Defendant was operating the welfare center without having Had the Had the Had's Had's Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' Had' 2, 2015.