1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. Disposition 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is to reduce part of the claim in this court.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a special corporation that has been entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and the Defendant He Interesting Marine and Fire Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the insurance period with respect to the B wing-F vehicles owned by A (hereinafter “A”) (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”) from October 25, 2012 to October 25, 2013.

B. At around 17:30 on July 31, 2013, C completed the work at the site of Heung-gun, and, at the end of Heung-gun’s return to A, she shocked from the 4km point (4km point km from the shore of C’s C’s shores due to driving care due to driving care on the part of Heung-gun’s located outside of C’s road.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The victim, who was on board the steering line due to the instant accident, suffered bodily injury, such as spathn and spathn in the part of the body of the lower part of the body, the spathn and spathn in the inner part, the inner part, the inner part and the tag, the inner part and the surface of the right, the heat and the surface of the spathn, the right spathn in the right spathn, and the spathn and spathn were hospitalized from July 31, 2013 to November 20, 2013, and was hospitalized (35 days) to 78 days.

The Plaintiff paid the victims of medical care benefits of KRW 5,334,380, temporary layoff benefits of KRW 4,354,560.

E. The injury inflicted on the victim due to the instant accident falls under class 8 of class 8 under Article 3(1)2 [Attachment Table 1] of the former Enforcement Decree of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25940, Dec. 30, 2014; hereinafter “former Enforcement Decree of the Act”), and the limitation of insurance coverage for liability insurance is 2,40,000 won.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Establishment and scope of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts on the basis of Paragraph 1 of the determination on the cause of the occurrence of the liability for damages, the victim suffered injury due to the operation of the Defendant vehicle, and thus, the Defendant Company, the insurer of the Defendant vehicle, is the insurer.