logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2020.10.29 2020고합38
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven years.

The information on the accused shall be disclosed through an information and communications network for five years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

Before January 2019, the person subject to a request for attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") and the person subject to a request for attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") have dialogueed with the victim B (a person, a person, and a person).

At that time, the Defendant appeared to be 17 years of age from the victim, and thereafter, the victim was aware of the fact that the victim was a child or juvenile because the victim was scheduled to graduate from a middle school.

In the past, the Defendant divided the victim’s face and clothes, sexual intercourse, etc. with the victim into the victim’s face and chest, and the victim’s name, age, school, residence, etc., and used the victim’s name, age, domicile, etc., and used the victim’s name, age, domicile, etc., to divide the victim’s obscene dialogue with the male who met with the Defendant if the victim did not take the victim’s demand. As such, the Defendant attempted to threaten the victim to have the frighten victim follow the victim’s direction, and to have the frighten victim follow the Defendant’s direction.

1. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

A. On February 2019, the Defendant knew of the name, age, school, place of residence, etc. of the victim at a place where it is unknown at around February 2019, using a photograph of the victim’s face, chest, and negative body body, in which the victim did not respond to the sexual relationship, and divided the victim’s obscene dialogue with the male who met in the Defendant’s sexual intercourse if the victim did not respond to the sexual relationship. As if he spreads the fact that the Defendant taken and transmitted the body pictures, the “du characters” referred to by the Defendant of the Defendant of the first year D of C school refers to the “com”. The “du characters” refers to the “com” of the victim as if he knew of the fact that the victim sent the body name of the victim, address special to the address of the school, etc., and led the victim to the suppression of the victim’s resistance by threatening, and around that time, the victim’s resistance.

arrow