1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B and C jointly share KRW 126,762,730 and Defendant B.

The grounds for the indication of the claim against Defendant B and C are as shown in the attached Form of the claim.

(1) Defendant B: Decision without holding any pleadings (Article 208(3)1 and Article 257(2) of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act). Defendant C: The Plaintiff sells tools, lumbers, etc. with the trade name E from E, in the case of E.

On January 1, 2017: (a) F. 683,100 on January 31, 2017; (b) F. 1, 2017; (c) on June 25, 2017: (a) on March 1, 2016; (b) the Plaintiff supplied goods to Defendant 1, 598, 190 H H 190 on May 1, 2017; and (c) on the aggregate of the 683,913,913, 200 GG 2017; and (d) during the period from May 31, 2017 to May 31, 2017 (hereinafter “Defendant 2, 46,850 I supply goods to Defendant 1, 2017; (c) the aggregate of the 7.5th 1,75,719,785, Nov. 1, 2016; (d) the Plaintiff

On September 29, 2017, the Plaintiff received KRW 14,174,00 from Sama Co., Ltd., a main contractor at the J-site, as the repayment of the instant goods, KRW 17,546,430 as the payment for the instant goods.

[Ground of recognition] In light of the facts without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 3 and 4 (including additional numbers), and the purport of the entire pleadings, the court below held that the defendant Sung Ho Construction is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 46,765,265 won in the balance of the price of the goods (=78,485,695 won in the price of the goods of this case - KRW 14,174,600 in the payment - the above payment - KRW 17,546,430 in the payment - the above payment - the payment 17,546,430 won in the payment - the following day after the delivery date of a copy of the application for change of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim of this case from December 9, 2017 to

The judgment of Defendant Sung Construction Co., Ltd. as to Defendant Sung Ho Construction’s defense is based on J and K’s original contractor at K and K’s site, and is based on the foregoing.