1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,942,824 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from July 11, 2014 to April 9, 2015, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a management body established in accordance with the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “the Aggregate Buildings Act”) with all sectional owners in modern beesco buildings in Hanam-si, Hanam-si as its members.

B. From August 7, 2013 to August 13, 2013, the Defendant purchased respectively 401, 427, and 456 among the above buildings (hereinafter referred to as “instant commercial building”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer from August 7, 2013 to August 13, 2013.

On December 204, 2004 to June 2013, there is no dispute over the fact that the management expenses for the section for common use (A x 0.65) are equivalent to 65% of the total management expenses. As a result of the calculation, the amount below the cost shall be discarded. The amount below the cost shall be discarded. The amount of arrears (A B 401 6,987,490 won 4,541,868 won 1,387,740 won 8,375,230 won 427,77,260 won 4,795,219 won 1,461,461,720 won 8,838,980 won for common use area management expenses (A) 7,085,750 won for common use area 4,605,737 won 1,407,407, 297, 297 won 2084 won.

C. At the time of the Defendant’s acquisition of the above ownership, the previous owners of the instant commercial building were unpaid management expenses from December 2004 to June 2013 to the Plaintiff, but the details thereof are as follows.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The existence and scope of the obligation to pay management expenses and the common areas of an aggregate building, which are the common areas of an aggregate building, shall be contributed to the interests of all the co-owners, and it is necessary to jointly maintain and manage the common areas of an aggregate building and to guarantee, in particular, the claims

Accordingly, Article 18 of the Multi-Family Building Act provides that "The claim that the co-owner has against another co-owner with respect to the section for common use may be exercised against the special successor," so that the special provision allowing the special successor of the co-owner to claim for the claim against the section for common use regardless of his intention to succeed.