A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 27, 2017, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Daejeon District Court’s Branch on October 27, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

1. At around 07:30 on September 3, 2019, the Defendant driven a vehicle of 20 meters from the 4km-purburged from the Suwon-si transferdong at approximately 0.209% of blood alcohol level to the 0.209% of the 0.209% of the 07:30 on May 3, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

2. 2019 highest 6807;

A. From around 01:40 on September 24, 2019, the Defendant driven a vehicle with blood alcohol concentration of about 7 km from the front of a restaurant in the mutual influence room in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to the front of a veterinary hospital in the same time-si C, the Defendant driven a vehicle with two hurbbbn, under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.156%, from the 7km section to the front of a veterinary hospital in the same time-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

B. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B-to-purd.

The defendant above A.

While under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.156% on the date and time stated in the port, the said vehicle was driven by driving the said vehicle, leading the DNA hospital in Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, along three-lanes from the distance of transfer to the distance of transfer construction.

At the time of the defendant's running direction, the Fststy taxi of the victim E (Seoul, 57 years old) was stopping for the signal waiting, so in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to maintain the safety distance and accurately operate the brake system, and to prevent the collision with the motor vehicle in front of the driving direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in operating the brakes accurately, thereby spreading the part of the victim taxi in front of the Defendant’s car.