1. On December 1, 2015, around 14:58, 14:58, the wind of the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, dong-gu, dong-gu, Yacheonando, Seocheonsan Expressway;

(2) have occurred at a gold farm.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer that entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with B (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) setting the insurance period from September 19, 2015 to September 19, 2016 with respect to the instant motor vehicle.

B. A around 14:58 on December 1, 2015, 14:58, 2015, the windline of the Yananannam-gu, dong-gu, dong-gu, dong-gu, dong-gu, Anncheon

Before running the instant vehicle in the Guide, the wind owned by the Defendant due to the malfunction of the brakes.

The accident was caused by the charge collection fee collection volume of the gold lawsuit (hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case").

C. The Defendant caused the instant accident to the 9-lane charge collection number of the said fare office, and the 8-lane charge collection number was partially damaged, and the 9-lane charge collection system in the 9-lane charge collection unit (per minute, traffic right verification machine, receipt issuing machine, tea control machine, communication power source cable), the vehicle line signal lights installed on the upper part of the fare collection unit, mobile erosion protection wall, gradles are damaged.

The Plaintiff paid the Defendant the expenses for capital and the removal of fices, the expenses for the production and installation of glars, the points construction, and the expenses for repair of mobile protective walls, among the damages that the Defendant incurred due to the instant accident.

[Grounds for Recognition: The descriptions of Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. According to the above basic facts as to the occurrence of the Plaintiff’s obligation, A neglected the obligation to properly maintain and operate the brake while operating the instant vehicle, and caused the damage to the Defendant’s fare collection system, etc. due to the negligence committed.

Therefore, the Plaintiff, the insurer of the instant vehicle, bears the obligation to compensate the Defendant for each amount of damages arising from the charge collection fee collection system, the fee collection system in Switzerland, and the signal of the tea.

3. Scope of Plaintiff’s debt

A. Determination of damages equivalent to the 8th rate collection license repair cost, A.