Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2012, at around 00:55, the Defendant, within Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, requested the customer to return home to the Defendant, the Defendant, a slope F (48 years of age) belonging to the Nowon Police Station E District of the Nowon Police Station, which was called “the victim, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant frights his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright to his fright,”

Summary of Evidence

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defense counsel asserted that the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime in this case, and that the defendant was under the weak ability to discern things or make decisions. However, in light of the criminal circumstances, contents, and the defendant’s behavior acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment, it does not appear that the defendant had the weak ability to discern things or make decisions at

Therefore, the defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.