logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단1522
주민등록법위반등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months for the crimes of No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1522"

1. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 08:10 of the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act violation (unlicensed driving) driven a Cknife vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.079% from the road front of a convenience store that may know the trade name near the central children’s hospital in the New-dong of Gwangju Mine-gu to the low-income vehicle in the same Dong from around 100 meters away from the road in the 100-meter section to the low-income vehicle in the same Dong

2. Around 08:13 on the same day as Paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) when it was discovered that drunk driving was driven by E at the D District Department of the Gwangju Mine Police Station; and (b) the name was “F”; and (c) the resident registration number was “G” and “G” was used unlawfully by the Defendant.

"2015 Highest 1677"

3. On October 11, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months by imprisonment with prison labor for the offense of insult at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 19, 2013.

The Defendant became aware of the Victim J who operated landscaping companies under the trade name of "I" as a member of the Gwangju H H Housing Redevelopment Project Association.

The Defendant, around June 24, 2009, transferred from the victim who believed it to be the account in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant at the mutual unclaimed restaurant in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, stating that “The payment is needed, and if the redevelopment project is carried out, the amount will be deducted from the construction cost later, and the amount will be paid out if the selection is known, then the Defendant will be paid out with the borrowed money.” The Defendant was wired from the victim who believed it to be the account in the name of the Defendant, respectively.

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the above money to the victim.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and acquired 25 million won by receiving 25 million won from the victim as a honorarium for the selection of the landscaping company.

arrow