The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (4 months of imprisonment).

2. It is recognized that the judgment was based on the following facts: the defendant recognized the crime of this case; the defendant's damage from the crime of this case was not significant.

On the other hand, however, the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he was punished several times due to the same crime, in particular, even during the suspension period due to the same crime, and therefore the nature of the crime of this case is not weak, the suspension of execution against the defendant is impossible, and the defendant repeats the fraudulent crime since 2003 and thus the risk of repeating the crime is high. Considering the fact that strict punishment is inevitable, and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the records such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime, it is not unreasonable to view that the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive. Thus, the defendant's assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.