Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense, rhythizing the facts charged without changing the indictment and recognizing the facts charged.

On October 15, 2014, around 22:35, the Defendant took a dispute with the victim B (the age of 33) at the Jinnam tunnel of the mid-west-west Highway 176 km from the illegal Dong at the time, and caused the victim to be pushed away with her face face, and caused the victim to be pushed down with her face face, and caused the victim to be pushed down with her hump and face with her face for about seven days.

Summary of Evidence

1. A report on investigation (part of video data of black boxes) and a photograph attached thereto, eight copies, one CD;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that since he only resisted against the victim's assault, he does not have the intent of injury, or constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act.

2. According to the evidence revealed above, it can be acknowledged that the defendant committed the above act with the intent of attack against the victim. Thus, it is difficult to view that the defendant's act constitutes self-defense or legitimate act to defend the victim's unfair infringement.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.