logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.03.19 2014고단6074
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2009, the Defendant was released on September 28, 2012 and passed on March 12, 2013 while he was sentenced to imprisonment for committing murder and attempted murder at the Seogu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court for three years and six months, and was released on September 28, 2012.

1. On July 15, 2014, around 00:15, the Defendant threatened the victim E (the age of 22) who was mixed with tobacco in the south-gu Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, with a view to “Is the victim E (the age of 22) and snow string, she expressed the victim’s attitude that “Is the victim’s body, such as the victim’s flag, weather flag, snow, snow, and weather flag, might be seen to be the victim’s flag.”

2. On July 15, 2014, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) on the front of the Nonghyup branch of the Nonghyup Bank in Daegu-gu, Daegu-ro 152-1, the Defendant reported 112 that “Any male will come up and will be able to do so; (b) any other person shall also be reported; (c) any other person shall also be harmed; and (d) the police box of the Southern Police Station that called to the site after receiving a 112 report that “I have been reported. I have received a report; (d) I have to confirm only a motor vehicle accident, so I have to cooperate.” However, the Defendant continued to walk, “I will see why I will do so, why I will do, why I will do, and why I would be, good citizens.”

After that day, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of performance of official duties and moved to the F police box located in Daegu-gu H at around 00:35 on the same day, and committed assault, such as receiving a assistant I’s franking part, who was carrying the Defendant from the patrol vehicle to the back head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the police officer G, I's 112 reported cases and the taking-over of flagrant offenders, which are police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each police statement made to E, G, and I;

1. Ethical sloping photographs;

arrow