Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant driven BM3 vehicles as his duties.

On December 17, 2012, at around 19:55, the Defendant operated the said vehicle on the three-distance intersection (38 national highways) in front of the Joint Elementary School located in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, and is straightened by the Defendant from the direction of the military intersection to the military intersection from the direction of the salute.

At the place of accident, it is due to the negligence in the course of duty that entered a straight line by the electric red signal and violated the signal, and at the same time, it is sent at the right-hand turn from the second line of the adjacent letter.

The driver of the victim C (the 43 years old and the 43-year old and the 43-year old and the 40-year old and the 46-year old and the 40-year old and the 40-year old and the 50-year old and the upper left-hand turn followed by an open upper part of the 3-day front front side of the vehicle in front to the driver of the damaged vehicle, who is in charge of the driver of the damaged vehicle, by taking advantage of the 3-day front front part of the vehicle in front, the driver of the damaged vehicle was in charge of the right shouldering and the upper part of the vehicle in need of the eight-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In violation of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the victim suffered eight warning injury from E among the victims, and the driver of the victimized vehicle C suffered three warning injury, and there is a need for punishment corresponding thereto. However, the defendant recognized the crime, the defendant was a first offender, the victim E was the driver of the vehicle driven by the defendant, and the victim E was the driver of the vehicle driven by the defendant and agreed with the victim E as ordered in consideration of the agreement with the victim.