beta
Text
1. The Defendant: 50,904,100 won to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 20, 2014 to January 13, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On February 10, 2010, the Defendant and the Intervenor joining the Defendant entered into a lease agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant, setting the lease agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant to lease the 80,000 apartment F, Kimhae-si as the lease deposit amount of KRW 80,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 100,000, and the lease term of February 22, 2012, and paid KRW 80,000,000 to the Defendant as the lease deposit.
(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.
The Changwon District Court Decision 2012TBU 2012TT 4139, which received an assignment order (a trade name after modification: HH, hereinafter referred to as “G”) from Changwon District Court 2012TU 4139 on May 18, 2012, which received an assignment order for KRW 50,904,100 of the lease deposit amount of the instant lease agreement against the Defendant by the Defendant joining the Defendant, as the repayment order of KRW 80,00,000, out of the lease deposit amount of the instant lease agreement against the Defendant.
The above assignment order was served on the defendant on June 11, 2012, and was finalized on June 26, 2012.
(hereinafter “instant first assignment order”) C.
The Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Changwon District Court 2012TTT 5761 assignment order was issued by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor on July 11, 2012, based on the instant first assignment order against the Defendant by Changwon District Court 2012TB 200,000 won in the face value of KRW 52,90,00 issued by the Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. (Law Firm I No. 254, 2012; hereinafter “instant No. notarial deed”). The Plaintiff’s Intervenor issued an order of seizure and all of the claims that G would receive from the Defendant pursuant to the instant first assignment order.
The above assignment order was served on the defendant on July 30, 2012, and was finalized on August 10, 2012.
(hereinafter “instant second assignment order”) D.
(1) The Defendant and the Defendant’s Intervenor agreed to terminate the instant lease agreement on February 2014, and the Defendant returned to the Defendant’s Intervenor the amount of KRW 80,00,000 as the lease deposit under the instant lease agreement from February 17, 2014 to December 19, 2014. (2) The Defendant’s Intervenor and the Defendant’s Intervenor returned to the Defendant’s Intervenor on December 15, 2014.