logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.10.24 2019가합32019
무기한 정권처분 무효확인
Text

1. It is confirmed that the Defendant’s indefinite regime that the Plaintiff issued on July 20, 2018 is null and void.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relation 1) The defendant is the C Trade Union (hereinafter "C")

(D) and D Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as “D”)

In accordance with the integration, the Plaintiff is a trade union established on February 16, 2016 for the purpose of establishing the labor rights of workers engaged in all unions across the country. 2) The Plaintiff is a member of the Defendant’s association (F branch) and a member of the GM (hereinafter “MM”) who is a superior organization affiliated with the Defendant, and a member of the GM (hereinafter “MM”) who was elected as the 7 and eight chairpersons of GM (hereinafter “MM”) who was elected from February 2014 to May 2019 and was serving as the chairperson of the instant EM.

B. 1) In the process of seeking the conversion into a trade union with a single legal personality as a member of a number of trade unions including the Defendant, the instant chain of association is the H Trade Union around December 201 (hereinafter “instant trade union”).

(2) On January 6, 2016, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (hereinafter “I”) decided to withdraw under the condition that the instant association will withdraw on the condition of January 6, 2016. On February 3, 2016, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy made a decision to dismiss the instant association from the instant association under the condition that the instant association will make efforts to integrate the instant association with the instant association at the election of the chairperson of the instant association. (2) On February 2, 2017, the Plaintiff was unable to provide a pledge to the effect that the instant association would make efforts to consolidate the instant association with the instant association at the election of the chairperson of the instant association. (3) On February 2, 2017, after being elected as the eight chairperson of the instant association, the Plaintiff requested the instant association members of the instant association (hereinafter “I”) to join the instant association and re-conven the instant association to resolve the conflict between the instant association and the instant association to resolve the conflict between the instant association.

C. A disciplinary decision against the Plaintiff is rendered by the Defendant on April 20, 2018.

arrow