A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 3, 2007, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on September 13, 2008, a summary order of KRW 300,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license) in the same court on September 13, 2008, and the same court on April 27, 2009 issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (on April 27, 2009), and on January 24, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (on January 24, 2014, for a violation of the Road Traffic Act) at the fathercheon Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on February 4, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

Although the Defendant had been punished twice or more due to drinking driving, on August 2, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.140% without obtaining a driving license on August 23:52, 201, driven B rocketing car at approximately 100 meters from the front day of the Sejong-si Pyeong-dong Track-dong Track-dong, to the front day of the Sejong-si Underground Road in the same city of the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the drinking driving control, and a driver's license inquiry;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, summary order, application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is as follows: (a) although the defendant is led to the confession of the crime, there is no room for the wife in that the defendant committed the crime again during the suspended execution period due to the same crime.

Therefore, considering the age, character and conduct, circumstances after crimes, etc. of defendants, the punishment as ordered shall be determined as per Disposition.