1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

At the time of the accident, at around 18:40 on December 7, 2019, the defendant vehicle CD at the time of the accident, and at around 18:40 on December 7, 2019, the defendant vehicle in the situation of the collision with T-type intersection without signal, etc. near the north-dong at the place of Yangsan-si, in excess of the temporary suspension line at the above intersection, and the defendant vehicle was in the right side of the vehicle of the plaintiff vehicle, and paid the insurance proceeds of the collision with the part above, 3,527,90 won

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserted that the defendant's vehicle's collision while proceeding beyond the temporary stop line in order to turn to the left in violation of the order of prohibition of left turn, and that the accident of this case occurred due to the unilateral negligence of the defendant vehicle.

As to this, the defendant asserts that the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence, etc. that the plaintiff's vehicle, while the defendant's vehicle was trying to circumvent, failed to see the front side properly.

B. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the aforementioned evidence and the overall purport of the pleadings as seen earlier, that is, the Defendant’s vehicle’s main fault going beyond a temporary stop line of approximately 7 meters away from the lane in the direction of the Plaintiff’s running of the said intersection. On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was negligent in failing to take a proper look at the said intersection while driving the said intersection. In light of the Plaintiff’s vehicle damaged by the instant accident and the type of the Defendant vehicle, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 3, cannot be recognized that the instant accident was attempted to turn to the left, and it is difficult to recognize that the instant accident occurred, and in light of the background of the accident, the degree of conflict and shock indicated in the record, etc., the instant accident is the Plaintiff.