logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2015.06.12 2015고단133
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures Taken after Accidents), a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Operation of a gallon) are those engaged in driving of a vehicle which is a gallon.m., and on October 24, 2014, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol at 0.132% in the influence of alcohol level on October 24, 2014, and led to the intersection of the U.S. e., the U.S. e., the U.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to the traffic signal to a person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to go through the intersection of a stop line in violation of the signal, was driven by the victim C(54 years old) who was driving in the territorial sea from the bend of the bend of the bend of the bend of the motor vehicle operated by the victim C(54 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, immediately stopped the victim C with a scambling of a string wall that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, suffered from the injury of the victim E (the victim E (the 49 years old), including a cambage that requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the said vehicle to the extent that the market price is scrapped at a level equivalent to KRW 6.8 million, and saving the victim.

2. A defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a galloning motor vehicle, and an automobile not covered by mandatory insurance shall not be operated on the road;

The Defendant operated a gallon automobile that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow