logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.12.10 2019가단132275
선급금반환
Text

1. Defendant C shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 110,00,000 as well as 12% per annum from March 5, 2020 to the full payment.

Reasons

1. To Defendant C, indication of claim * is identical to description of the cause of the claim separately appended.

* A judgment by service by public notice, only matters necessary to specify a claim pursuant to Article 208(3)(3) of the Civil Procedure Act, and the remaining detailed reasons are omitted. 2. Defendant B

A. According to the purport that the Plaintiff would receive an order for electrical construction among D apartment reconstruction construction works, the Plaintiff paid KRW 110,000,000 to Defendant C, Defendant B, and Nonparty E at its cost. Unlike the promise, the Plaintiff did not receive the order for electrical construction, and Defendant B promised to jointly and severally with Defendant C and Nonparty E to return KRW 110,00,000 to the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 110,000,000 in accordance with the agreement.

B. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that Defendant B promised to return KRW 110,000,000 paid by the Plaintiff, like the Plaintiff’s assertion.

(Defendant B only introduced the business and did not use the money, and therefore the return is not promised. (C)

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B cannot be accepted, and it is dismissed.

arrow