The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On December 26, 2014, the Defendant lent money to the Defendant by leaving a counter-party in C Jeonpo-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, 19:00 on December 26, 2014.

The issue of the interest on the money borrowed from the victim D who has paid money and found his/her father. While the dispute has occurred, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by voiceing "Shos, Mara" to the victim on the job where two his/her father and father of the defendant are his/her father.

2. The “public performance” in the crime of insulting a board means a state in which many, unspecified or unspecified persons can be recognized. Thus, if there is a possibility that a certain fact about a certain person might be disseminated to an unspecified or unspecified person, even if it satisfies the requirements of performance, the public performance lacks the possibility of spreading otherwise.

(See Supreme Court Decision 83Do49 delivered on April 10, 1984, etc.). According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the fact that the defendant was a victim’s her child at the time when the defendant took the above bath, the father of the defendant and his her her son and her son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son were not likely to spread to many and unspecified persons, barring any special circumstances, barring special circumstances, she is difficult to view that the son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son were many, and there

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, it is so decided as per Disposition with the decision of not guilty under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act