The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s criminal law and method was interviewed and planned; (b) the Defendant’s criminal act was committed several times of larceny; (c) even if there was a record of having been punished several times of larceny, the Defendant’s completion of the execution of imprisonment; and (d) the Defendant’s means and result of the commission of the crime; and (c) other various conditions of sentencing as indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age and sexual conduct, even if the commission of the larceny was committed for the purpose of raising operating expenses for the risk of real name as the Defendant’s assertion, the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, according to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, Article 329 of the Criminal Act is changed to "Article 330 of the Criminal Act" as "Article 330 of the Criminal Act.