Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of four million won, and by imprisonment of ten months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

(a) Any person who violates the Food Sanitation Act shall obtain permission from the competent authority from a person who intends to run an entertainment shop business;

Nevertheless, on April 16, 2016, the Defendant did not obtain a license to engage in an entertainment shop business from the competent administrative agency, and, on the part of the Defendant’s operation “G” located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, installed a room of 66.1m2 in the size of the business site, and sold drinking and liquors to the nameless customers, who find the above points, and had workers engaged in entertainment, such as H (V, 46 years old), etc. sing in company with customers with music or dance, and engaged in entertainment shop business by inducing them to provide entertainment.

B. On July 2014, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant had been committing the crime.

A, upon registering the said “G” in the name of A, requested A to serve as the “the president of the second president” as if the said “G” was a real operator, and provided A with KRW 1,00,000 per month in return.

피고인은 2016. 4. 16. 경 전 항과 같이 무허가로 유흥 주점 영업을 하다가 경찰관으로부터 단속이 되자 A에게 “G에 단속이 떴다.

G Duro, the G asked that if only four is the president of the fake, the fine will be resolved by the internal organ.

On April 16, 2016, A stated that he/she is the actual operator of the said “G” to the police officer’s name in the above “G”, and on the same day, he/she made a statement to the effect that he/she was investigated as a suspect at the Seoul Eastern District Public Prosecutor’s Office located in 221 in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and around November 15, 2016, at the Seoul East District Public Prosecutor’s Office located in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant had A make a false statement to an investigative agency, thereby instigating A to avoid crimes.

2. Defendant A: (a) around April 16, 2016, Defendant A was the actual operator of G, even though the pertinent main points are substantially operated by B; and (b) Defendant A was the actual operator of G.