1. All appeals filed by both Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and Plaintiff SP Co., Ltd. are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 1, 2010, Plaintiff A and Defendant B owned the instant land Nos. 1 and 2) Plaintiff A completed the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to the instant land No. 1 and its ground buildings. 2) Defendant B completed the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to the land No. 1 and its ground buildings adjacent to the northwest-west-west-do Land No. 1 on October 23, 2003 (hereinafter “instant land No. 2”).

B. Defendant B, who occupied the part of the instant dispute’s land through Defendant B’s instant structure, occupies the part of the instant dispute’s land by owning the structure installed on the ground of 5m2 (hereinafter “the part of the instant dispute’s land”) connected each point of the attached Table 1, 8, 9, 10, 10, and 1 among the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, in order to each point of the attached Table 1, 8, 9, 10, and 1.

C. The plaintiff A and the defendant B filed a lawsuit against the defendant B regarding the right to passage over surrounding land in the order of the attached appraisal No. 2,8,20, and 2 among the land of this case owned by the defendant B, to confirm that the plaintiff A had the right to passage over surrounding land over the area of 9 square meters as to the "D" portion of the attached appraisal No. 2,8,20, and 2 (the "C" portion of the land of this case, which was connected in the order of the attached appraisal No. 2, the land of this case, which was owned by the defendant B, and the plaintiff A reduced the purport of the claim in the appellate court, and the plaintiff A was finally confirmed as follows: "The plaintiff had the right to passage over surrounding land over the part of the "p" portion of the land of this case, which was connected in the order of 32,2,33, and 32 square meters among the land of this case, and the above judgment became final and conclusive

1) Of the land in this case, the rent for each of the periods from June 1, 2010 to July 28, 2014 in the attached Form 1 is as indicated in the attached Form 1.2) Of the land in this case, the amount of the rent for each of the periods from June 1, 2010 to July 28, 2014 is as indicated in the attached Table 32, 2, 33, and 32, the attached appraisal in the attached Form 2 is as follows.