1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the reasoning of the judgment, shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the plaintiff is specifically emphasized or newly claimed in this case by the court of first instance as the grounds for appeal, and where the judgment of the plaintiff is added pursuant to paragraph (2).

2. The Plaintiff asserts that: (a) at the time of refugee interview, the Plaintiff’s further determination is based on the following circumstances: (b) the Plaintiff made a relatively specific and consistent statement on the grounds that the risks of gambling occur to himself/herself at the time of refugee interview; (c) even if some of his/her statements are inconsistent with the details, it is due to the Plaintiff’s suffering from refugee interviews in unstable psychological conditions due to his/her experience and imminent situation; (c) the Plaintiff did not have an opportunity to learn the interest in the interest of his/her classical doctrine, etc. due to the Plaintiff’s lack of adequate writing or reading of letters; and (iv) pursuant to the UN Convention on International Protection of the UN Refugee (UNCLOS), specific knowledge on religion is not necessarily connected to the authenticity of belief; and even if there is no substantial knowledge about the doctrine or performance of religion, it may be harmful on the ground of religion, on the ground of religion.

However, considering the above circumstances, the first instance court’s determination that it is difficult to believe the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the ground for applying for refugee status is reasonable, and the Plaintiff’s above assertion is not acceptable, even if comprehensively considering the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff to this court.

The plaintiff is not in a state of nationality, but in a state of nationality, it is difficult to protect public authority or use a judicial system due to the weak judicial system of the state of nationality.