A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2014, the defendant was divorced from D on February 9, 2014, and the victim C (41) is a golf course capital manager and D's workplace.

On June 4, 2014, around 00:50, the Defendant entered the Dong-gu Daejeon E-Ba 404 on June 4, 2014, and reported a female with the victim in the ward.

Thus, the defendant rans a fluor's disease, which is a dangerous object in his place, and the victim fluor's disease, and the victim fluor's head fluor's body fluor's body fluor's body fluor's body fluor's body fluor's body fluor's body fluor's body fluor's body fluor.

Therefore, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as an open upper part of other head, which requires approximately 3 weeks medical treatment (around 7 cm in length, approximately 1.5 cm in depth, and a left inner part of 1.5 cm in depth).

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses C and D each legal testimony;

1. Police investigation report (on-site investigation of the case);

1. Police investigation report (Attachment of records of medical treatment for victims) - Copy of medical records;

1. A medical certificate of injury (C);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, photographs, and field pictures;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 32(1) and Article 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss the Compensation Order [the scope of compensation liability (in particular, consolation money) is not clear only with the materials submitted by the applicant for compensation, and it appears to be reasonable to recover damage through other legal remedies, such as civil procedure, etc., so the applicant’s application for the compensation order of this case is dismissed] on the grounds of sentencing is the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing. The crime of this case is not easy in light of the following: (a) the defendant does not deny the crime of this case and does not reflect all; (b) the defendant did not agree with the victim; (c) the defendant did not agree with the victim; and (d) the defendant made efforts to recover damage to the victim.