1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant, the appointed party) and the appointed party are indicated in the claim amount column of the attached Table.

1. Determination on the main claim

A. In addition to the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2-1 through 3, 2-1, 3, and 5-1 through 3, the facts of recognition can be acknowledged that the plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff") and the designated parties (when collectively referred to the plaintiff and the designated parties, "the plaintiff, etc.") under employment by the defendant and provided labor at the Gangnam-gun C New Housing Construction Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the construction of this case") for each corresponding period in the service period column in the attached Table No. 10, they did not receive wages in the same column of claim amount of the same Table, and only the statement No. 10 of Eul does not interfere with the above recognition.

[Defendant merely entered into a labor contract with the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties are the workers employed by the Plaintiff, and thus, the designated parties do not have an obligation to pay wages to the designated parties. However, based on the monthly output list (No. 2-1-3 of the evidence No. 2), the document confirming the actual working day of the Plaintiff, etc. and daily wages (the document No. 3 of this case and the claim amount of this case are replaced by the amount of this case).

3) The Defendant directly signed by the Defendant, and the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff, etc. the sum of KRW 126,480,000,00 for the same details as the instant claim amount, in the case of violation of the Labor Standards Act (No. 2018 Godan5154, Incheon District Court Decision 2018 Godan51

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff et al. the amount of each claim in the attached sheet and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from December 4, 2017 to the date of full payment, as claimed by the plaintiff, etc., 14 days after the date of the final retirement of the plaintiff et al., as claimed by the plaintiff.

2. Judgment on the counterclaim

A. The Defendant 1’s assertion is at the construction site of this case.