logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.08.25 2015고단2029
무고
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who had an internal relationship with D (E after the name of the Defendant was named “E”) from October 201 to October 2013.

On November 2013, the Defendant received a complaint from D with the suspicion of injury, etc., and during that period, the Defendant had attempted to file a complaint with D with the false fact as if he had received intimidation from D, that there was a fact that the Defendant remitted money to D.

Accordingly, the Defendant, at the Ulsan-dong Police Station in Ulsan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu

“Intimid intimidation, the victim received 32.5 million won from February 28, 2013 to April 15, 2013 from the complainant and received 32.5 million won from the complainant.

A written complaint to the effect that " shall be drawn up and received to the police station of the Ulsan-dong Department on the same day."

However, the facts are that the defendant had in resistant relations at the time.

In order to make a stock investment using the securities account in the name of D, the above money was deposited into the securities account in the name of D, and it was not a threat from D, such as the defendant's assertion.

Accordingly, the defendant raised D's free will.

2. Determination:

A. Defendant D newly obtained a singing room, which requires KRW 120 million, to lend KRW 60 million to Defendant D, or to have his wife divorced and divorced from his wife, but the Defendant refused to use it, but thereafter D’s “the face-to-face width,” as it is deemed necessary to make a fright down payment, etc., while making intimidation, and sending it to Defendant D’s drinking and sending it, as it is necessary.

B. 1) The statement made by D as its main evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case is the statement made by D in this legal and investigative agencies.

arrow