The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of execution of two years, and community service 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court sentenced two years of suspended sentence to eight months of imprisonment, taking into account the favorable and unfavorable circumstances to the Defendant.

When comprehensively considering the conditions for sentencing in the trial, the sentencing of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion, and the sentencing guidelines, the sentencing of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion.

There is no circumstance that it is unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.

In addition, even if the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances, and result of the crime, etc. are considered, the sentence of the court below is proper and too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal for conclusion is without merit.