1. On November 28, 2017, the National Labor Relations Commission between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor to the Chairperson of the National Labor Relations Commission.

1. Case history

A. On December 31, 2003, an intervenor is engaging in manufacturing business, etc. using 16 full-time workers as a company established on December 31, 2003.

The plaintiff is a person who was employed by the intervenor on November 23, 2015 and served as a general executive director for business and marketing.

B. On April 4, 2017, the Plaintiff recognized that part of the Intervenor’s production products were omitted in the production performance report of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2016. On April 7, 2017, the Intervenor’s representative director C (hereinafter “representative”) reported this fact to the Intervenor’s representative director. On April 7, 2017, the Intervenor’s cosmetic Research Institute was affiliated with D directors and the chief director of the marketing team, E and Countermeasures Council.

C. In addition, on April 17, 2017, the Plaintiff asked the citizen question as to whether the products omitted in the Intervenor’s report on the production performance are likely to be in violation of the Cosmetics Act or the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act. On April 17, 2017, the Plaintiff received a reply from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety to the effect that the said questioning is deemed to be feed of the relevant products

On May 2, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) considered that the head of E spreads his will visa against himself; and (b) instructed the head of E division to the effect that “the Plaintiff would file a complaint as defamation by asking for responsibility for the payment of an action against the Plaintiff and the head of F division who retired from office.”

Accordingly, the head of E sent a large voice so that all employees can hear at the Plaintiff’s office, which read, “I and F talk about the question that I and F have a private right.” On the same day, the head of E complained of a telephone call to the representative director for his detention and discussed the grievances caused by the Plaintiff.

E. On May 8, 2017, the representative director, who considered the above stories from the Vice-head of E, proceeded with an individual interview with employees on business difficulties, and interview with the Plaintiff on May 10, 2017.

▣ 2017. 5. 16. 8:34AM 발신자 : 원고 수신자 : 대표이사 제목 : 부당한 인사조치에 관한 요청

1. 5.10