A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:20 on July 3, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”) said that the Defendant was a driver of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (the age of 69) on the front of Dongjak-gu, Seoul, while getting in and getting out of the taxi as a customer and getting to a destination, the Defendant said that the victim was “the victim’s cell phone she was able to open and die,” without any reason under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. The injured Defendant assaulted the victim on the date, time, and place indicated in the above 1. Paragraph 1. as well as on the circumstances described in the above 1. Paragraph, and 2. In order to avoid this, the victim gets out of the said taxi to avoid this, and then kiddd the victim’s breath with the breath’s breath, and thereby, damaged the victim’s right head by drinking 2 times, which requires treatment for about 14 days.

3. On July 3, 2014, at around 04:58, the Defendant damaged public goods, following the arrest of flagrant offenders under the circumstances described in paragraphs (1) and (2) above, and after being transferred to the criminal office and office of the Seoul Dongjak Police Station located in Dong 1dong 72-35, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and immediately after being compelled by police officers to sit in the front seat of the Defendant, the Defendant avoided disturbance, such as refusing to comply with the police officers’ solicitation to sit in the front seat of the Defendant, and putting the saidD under investigation, taking the Defendant under investigation. To restrain this, the Defendant sprinked against the Defendant and sprinked the Defendant “spick typ, so as to see the front seat of the front seat of the Defendant, which would turn back to the front seat of the Defendant, and caused damage to the use of the goods in the public office by walking the suspect’s front seat so as to reduce the utility of the goods by using it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The statements of D and the statements of D;