logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.06.25 2020고정161
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On February 22, 2016, the Defendant entered “D”, “G”, and “D” in the column for the subscriber’s signature in the F mobile phone name transfer application form in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon without the victim D’s consent, in the column for the subscriber’s signature.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged a written application for the transfer of the victim's name, which is a private document concerning rights and duties.

B. On February 26, 2016, the Defendant stated “D”, “G”, and “D” in the name of the applicant column in the column for signature of the subscriber to the F mobile phone subscription application form with the J number, without the victim’s consent, in the column for signature.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a written application for joining a mobile phone in the name of the victim, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.

C. The Defendant was on April 19, 2016.

At the same place as in paragraph 1, K number’s cell phone (a model name: A1687-64) written application for compensation without the victim’s consent, entered “D”, “G” in the column of the subscriber, “D” in the applicant column, and “D” in its name.

As a result, the Defendant forged a written application for change of compensation for mobile phones in the name of the victim, which is a private document on rights and duties for the purpose of uttering.

2. The Defendant’s event of the above investigation document sent the private document, such as an application for new admission under the victim’s name, to the e-mail transfer to the e-mail office located in the third floor of Seo-gu Daejeon on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Written petition of D;

1. Application of each subscription application, and statutes governing Kakao Stockholm output;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 231 of the multiple-choice of Punishment Act (the point where Article 231 of the Private Document is involved), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point where a private document is

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Heavy Criminal Code; and

arrow