logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.10.31 2018나11822
징계해임무효확인의소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The argument that the plaintiff appealed in the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment in the court of first instance are sufficiently recognized as legitimate if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is added to the statement in Gap evidence 7 and Eul evidence 20 to 28, which are additionally submitted in the court of first instance. It is difficult to accept the plaintiff's argument in the court of first instance and the court of first instance.

(A) The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff suffered from both polar disorder among the Plaintiff’s assertion of the trial is demanding entertainment by taking advantage of the Plaintiff, and it is difficult to accept all the allegation that the Plaintiff was in a condition similar to a mental and physical disability or forced during the instant audit process, and that there was procedural defect. Therefore, the court’s explanation on this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the case in which some of the errors in the judgment of the first instance are written as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

(1) The 2nd 16th 16th 16th 1 of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be written with " October 26, 2016" " October 20, 2016."

② The dismissal disposition of this case was taken by the second two to three sides of the judgment of the first instance court (hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”) with “the dismissal of this case” (hereinafter “instant dismissal”).

(3) Five below the third sentence of the first instance court shall be subject to the 5th sentence " March 14, 2017" and the 5th sentence "disposition" shall be referred to as " March 24, 2017" and the 5th sentence shall be respectively referred to as "in dismissal."

4. The dismissal of this case shall be decided by the dismissal of this case according to the fourth and fourth written judgment of the court of the first instance.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow