logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.06.05 2014고단613
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in C Freight Driving.

On November 4, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 20:20, and led the road of six lanes in front of 515-1, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Mapo-gu, to the right bypassing from the boundary of the new intersection to about 20km an hour, depending on six lanes from the new intersection to the boundary of the new intersection.

On the other hand, there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, the driver has a duty of care to reduce speed and to check whether there is a pedestrian by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the driver, and to safely drive according to the traffic signal to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim D (26 years old) who gets off the kickboard from the right side of the defendant's running direction to the left side according to the driver's signals when the vehicle's progress signal is stopped, and caused the victim to face the face side of the victim on the front side of the above cargo vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as double mouths, which require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field photographs and photographs of household effects vehicles;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense.

1. The sentence is imposed within the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines, taking into account the following factors: (a) the injury of the victim of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is serious; (b) traffic accidents are paid in violation of signal signals; (c) the date when a fine is imposed due to drinking driving in the past; (d) the victim does not wish to punish; (e) the purchase of a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy; and (e) other various

arrow