A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On February 17, 2010, the Defendant had a total of seven criminal records, including imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years on July 21, 201, and imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years on November 20, 201, for damage to public goods at the Gwangju District Court’s Mapopoon branch, which was sentenced to a total of seven criminal records, including imprisonment with prison labor for not more than two years.

[2] The defendant's criminal facts C complained of the head identification card from the time he was arrested on the charge of injuries and detained in the Ganpo Police Station, and was escorted to the emergency room by police officers D and E belonging to the Ganpo Police Station, but there was no money to pay hospital expenses, and became contact with the defendant, and the defendant was discharged to the above hospital.

On May 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) before F Hospital located in G on May 21, 2018; (b) completed the Defendant’s medical treatment of F Hospital C; and (c) was requested by police officers D to pay hospital expenses, who prepared to return the vehicle to H escorted vehicle C, on board C; and (d) completed the medical treatment of F Hospital C; and (c) received a request for the payment of hospital expenses from D;

Doz. Doz. to pay hospital expenses

“A person assaulted against the victim, such as making one time his left face of the D with his own sound drinking.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning escorting duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Records of judgment: Application of the provisions of Part 9-9 Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a written inquiry about criminal history and text of judgment;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act [the scope of punishment] is that there is no basic area (six months to one year and six months), [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] there are many records of criminal punishment due to violence, etc. as indicated in the judgment of the defendant, but the crime of this case is committed.