(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.12 2016고단4383

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.12 2016고단4383

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who drives a HG car with D's franchise.

On September 16, 2016, the Defendant continued 43 national highways in front of the new Twitter church located in the Sacheon-si, Shincheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-do along the two-lanes of the airside.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front side and the left side and the right and the right, and to accurately manipulate the steering direction and the system so as to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop the vehicle and received the back part of the Fpoter car driven by the victim E, who stops in a stop new stop due to negligence, as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed the victim’s car to be in excess of KRW 1,015,718 for repair costs, but did not immediately stop and run without taking necessary measures, and escaped.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of drinking measurement) by the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was driven by the Defendant by the police officer I, who belongs to the police station of the Macheon Police Station, which found the Defendant’s domicile at the Defendant’s domicile after receiving 112 reports that the Defendant fleded and escaped from the said accident at around 18:50 on the date and time specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, and tracking the Defendant’s vehicle at the Defendant’s domicile.

Due to reasonable grounds, it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking in a manner that contains the whole breath of drinking three times between 30 minutes.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (limited to the measures not taken after accidents);

1. A witness;

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2016.01.19 2015고단3480

-의정부지방법원 2017.10.26 2017고정1818

-의정부지방법원 2017.12.01 2017고단4268

-의정부지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고단476

-의정부지방법원 2016.05.24 2015고단4569