A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the instant facts charged, the charge of occupational embezzlement is acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a police officer (a slope) working in the Cheongbuk Police Station H of the Chungcheongbuk Police Agency.

1. Larceny: Around 20:40 on June 12, 2013, the Defendant discovered a verbal message (at a market price equivalent to 300,000 won) set off by the victim K at the new airport located in the J restaurant located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and took advantage of the gaps in management, and later reported later, entered the vehicle into the vehicle’s age XG, which was parked in the said restaurant, and then cut off the victim’s oral message by using the cresh in the said restaurant’s parking lot.

2. On July 22, 2005, from around October 26, 2009 to around October 26, 2009, the Defendant was in charge of collecting fines for negligence and disposing of the seized vehicles by discovering and tracking the vehicles seized due to the delinquency in payment of fines for negligence from around March 2009 to around September 20 of the same year.

On August 2009, the Defendant discovered Nrho XG vehicles, which are vehicles subject to seizure, registered in the name of M in the name of Bocheon-ri, Cheongcheon-si, Chungcheongnamcheon-do, Chungcheongnamcheon-do, Seocheon-do, Ma, and towing the said vehicles to the Eth of the Boan Police Station.

In such cases, if a vehicle in arrears is found, the public official in charge of the investigation shall request an investigator to investigate if the vehicle is cancelled by electronic verification, and if the vehicle is not cancelled, he/she shall demand the owner of the vehicle to submit a written request for the payment of the administrative fine, and if it is no longer possible to deliver the vehicle by installment payment, or to provide a high-quality delinquent taxpayer with a written request for the payment of the administrative fine, the public official in charge has the duty to take necessary measures such as entrusting the Asset Management Corporation or verifying the register of the vehicle

However, the defendant is dissolved by a juristic person who is the owner and does not transfer his name.