logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.14 2015가단22218
대여금반환 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits against defendant C Co., Ltd and D Co. are dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 7, 2011, a notary public signed a notarial deed under a monetary loan agreement with the content that “the creditor shall set KRW 3,618,435,00 on January 31, 201 to the debtor on April 30, 201, set the due date for repayment of KRW 3,618,435,00 to the debtor on April 30, 201, and the joint guarantor shall guarantee the debtor’s obligation with the maximum amount of the guaranteed obligation amount of KRW 3,618,435,00, and agreed to jointly and severally with the debtor to discharge the obligation” as the notarial deed under a monetary loan agreement with the debtor.

(hereinafter referred to as the “notarial deed of this case”). (b) under the name of Defendant C and D (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Company”), Defendant E and F were drawn up with the lender, and the said loan certificate stated that the Defendant Company borrowed KRW 3,618,435,00 as the purchase price of land outside G in Osan-si and 46.

(hereinafter “the loan certificate of this case”). The list attached after the loan certificate of this case includes 3,316,095,000 won, including the plaintiffs, and the total of 3,618,435,000 won, and the interest thereon. Among them, the plaintiff A includes 22,80,000 won (hereinafter “Tlim Construction”) in total of 22,80,000 won (hereinafter “Tlim Construction”) in total of 10,100 won on November 10, 209.

[2] As to Plaintiff B, the Plaintiff indicated the sum of KRW 15,00,000 for principal and KRW 1,540,000 for interest and KRW 16,540,00 for interest and KRW 15,540 for interest and KRW 16,540 for interest and construction on August 27, 2010.

C. On February 8, 2011, large-scale forest construction was insolvent due to the suspension of current account transactions, and on December 23, 201, rehabilitation procedures were commenced on December 23, 201 with Suwon District Court 201 hap107, and on December 8, 2013, rehabilitation procedures were completed on December 8, 2014 after the rehabilitation plan approval was finalized on June 17, 2013, and on Defendant D, rehabilitation procedures began on December 23, 201 with Suwon District Court 201 hap106 on December 23, 201, and on June 17, 2013, rehabilitation procedures were completed on December 8, 2014.

In each of the above rehabilitation procedures, the plaintiffs' claims.

arrow