logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.07.10 2012나29771
명의개서
Text

1.On a request for change in exchange at the time of the trial,

A. The defendant is Red, B, C, D, and stock company of the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this part of the underlying facts are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, this part of the underlying facts is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

▣ 추가하는 부분 제9쪽 제9행 중 “원고들은” 다음에 “2003. 2. 15.”이라는 기재를 추가한다.

In Part 9, the appellate court shall add the statement "after the closure of the pleadings on May 18, 2007" to the following in Part 13.

Part 10. The following shall be added to the first place:

“A. The Plaintiff’s transfer of Plaintiff A’s membership to AE on June 19, 2008 shall add “A’s 35-1 through 7, A’s 36, A’ 16-1 through 9, B’s 23,28, and B’s 29-1 and 2’s 2” to the column for 10th 2 and 3th 3th 10.

▣ 고쳐 쓰는 부분 제9쪽 제11행 중 “2003가합122163호로” 부분을 “2003가합12163호로”라고 고친다.

2. As to the implementation of the membership registration procedure and the request for issuance of membership certificates

A. Determination on this Safety Defense 1) Defendant’s assertion 1) Red, B, C, D, E, G, and Taelim Environment Co., Ltd. holds all the membership cards issued by the East Leisure Co., Ltd., and was sentenced to the final and conclusive judgment of this case by filing a lawsuit seeking membership confirmation against Defendant based on the above membership cards. However, since the contents and form of the final and conclusive judgment of this case are publically permissible, it is reasonable for the Plaintiff to claim against the Defendant for the permission of use of the golf club facilities by asserting and proving the specific contents thereof, and there is no interest in filing a lawsuit seeking registration in the name of the member registry with no effect of any change in rights. 2) It is reasonable for the Plaintiff to claim that the Defendant use the golf club facilities (hereinafter “the golf club of this case”).

The rules of the Council shall be as follows:

arrow