logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.11.10 2014가단32922
주위토지 통행권 확인
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 21, 1992, I newly constructed a single-story house on the above site as an owner of JJ (in the case of land located in J, its lot number is specified) in Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si, J (hereinafter referred to as “J”) and sold a 1/2 share of the above site and a single-story house to L around March 14, 1994.

B. On August 30, 2002, the Plaintiff purchased L from L on August 30, 2002, and thereafter became the owner of K-gi 496 square meters finally through the partition of co-owned property on September 2, 2002 (hereinafter “instant land”).

On the other hand, Defendant B is the owner of 536 square meters in F prior to the instant land, G 6,596 square meters, G 2,985 square meters prior to the 580 square meters, and H 1,464 square meters prior to the instant land, and Defendant C is also the owner of E land adjacent to the instant land.

C. The land of this case is surrounded by M land on the northwest, the NN land on the northwest, and the D land on the south by the defendant B.

이 사건 토지 주위에는 ① 이 사건 토지에서 별지 감정도 표시 각 ㄴ 부분을 지나 공로로 통하는 통행로(이하 ‘제1통행로’라 한다), ② 위 M 토지에서 O, P 등을 지나 공로까지 이르는 별지 참고도면 표시 ㉮ 내지 ㉷의 각 점을 순차로 통행로(이하 ‘제2통행로’라 한다)가 있는데, 이 사건 토지와 제2통행로의 끝부분인 위 M 토지(위 ㉷ 부분) 사이의 약 10미터 부분은 폭이 좁고 경사져 있는 관계로 원고는 그동안 제1통행로를 이용하여 공로로 진출입하였다.

E. However, as the vehicles of Defendant B, who found the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff, suffered interference with the farming day due to noise, dust, etc. that may occur while using the first-way passage, Defendant B installed three-meter iron bars and two iron bars with a height of 1m between steel columns (hereinafter “instant obstacles”) on the line connecting each point in the attached Form 81 and 84 among F land around October 2010, and found the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff.

arrow