beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On December 29, 2008, G lent KRW 20,000 to the Defendant as at the time when the Defendant’s payment due was due and the Defendant’s pension (hereinafter “instant pension”) was sold.
(A) Evidence No. 1). (b)
G Death and inheritance G died on June 7, 2013, and the Plaintiff and the designated parties inherited G in proportion to the following table:
Name-Related Inheritance Ratio 3/11, Plaintiff A-2/11, 3/11, 3/11, 3/11, 3/11, 3/11, 4/11, 4/11, 2/11, 2/11
C. The Defendant sold the instant pen after the Defendant sold the instant pen.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings [Evidence Nos. 1 (Evidence No. 1) is presumed to have been authentic of the entire document due to the lack of dispute over the defendant's seal image part. The defendant claims that this document was forged by G, but the statement of Evidence No. 1 (Evidence No. 1) alone is insufficient to recognize the above facts, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Accordingly, the defendant's assertion
2. According to the facts acknowledged in paragraph (1) of the determination as to the cause of claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff and the designated parties, who succeeded to the loan claims against G, an amount set forth in the following table, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from July 7, 2016 (the day following the delivery of a copy of the instant complaint) to the day of full payment, which the Plaintiff seeks from the day of full payment.
F. F. F. F. F. F. 5,454,544 Plaintiff A3,636,364 of the 3,636,364 of the 364 of the 3,636,364 of the 3,636,364 of the 3,636,364 of the 3,6364
3. The defendant's assertion argues that KRW 20,000,000 was donated from G.
However, there is no evidence to prove the above facts of the assertion.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.
4. The plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.