The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On July 6, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act at the Cheongju District Court, for six months and two years of suspended execution, and for the same year.

7. 14. The decision became final and conclusive.

Since April 2011, the defendant, who operated the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. and operated the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. from around September 201, the defendant told the victim G who operated the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. F through E, the Director of the Construction Site of the Corporation, to pay the construction cost of KRW 16 million as the construction cost is completed when the construction is terminated.

However, in fact, the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd has been liable to pay a loan amounting to KRW 6.8 billion to the National Bank and KRW 400 million to the New Bank, and from July 201, the victim was unable to pay wages to the employees of the above C due to business deterioration, etc.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim do so, from October 201 to November 201 of the same year, and had the victim do construction work for the construction, heating, fishing, and fishing at the Havoon plant, and did not pay the price, thereby acquiring the pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 16 million for the construction cost.

2. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, as stated in the facts charged, the victim G who completed the construction-to-land construction-to-land construction-to-land construction works did not pay 16 million won the construction cost, but did not intend to acquire the said construction cost by fraud.

The following circumstances that can be recognized by the records of this case, i.e., (1) the defendant's operating company has been awarded a contract for the construction work of the factory in the amount of KRW 2,068,00,00 from the Dispute Settlement Bank D around April 201, and again awarded a subcontract to approximately 40 subordinate companies for each process and completed the construction work on November 201, 201, and (2) the construction work of the building-to-building system subcontracted by the victim G is almost little of the construction work in the process.