A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2007, the Defendant sentenced the Seoul Western District Court to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence) and completed the execution of the sentence on December 1, 2007.

"2013 Highest 532" is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On January 201, 2013, the Defendant received approximately 0.04g of psychotropic drugs for a single psychotropic medication, from a psychotropic drug, to E, who was known to the general public, at a “D” restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and received them.

2. On January 2013, the Defendant administered, in a vehicle parked in the Daegu-gu F Building, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, around 21:00, approximately 0.04g of philophonephones received as above, in the manner of drinking in water.

"2013 Highest 872"

1. At around 15:00 on February 17, 2009, G conspired with G, and without authority, at the same time near the Dong office located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of exercising, without authority, the Defendant forged and asked G to forge the lease contract and inform G of his/her personal information, and G used the paper of the lease contract purchased from the door-gu to the location of the real estate by means of stamp-type “Seoul City H”, “this million won is fixed”, “I, J”, and “K and A”, each of which is unauthorized to the lessor, and the lessor’s seal affixed to the above seal and affixed a new J and the Defendant’s seal, thereby forging one copy of the lease contract under the name of J, a private document related to rights and duties.

2. In collusion with L on February 17, 2009, the Defendant used a pre-tax contract under the name of J, which is a forged private document, by borrowing money fromO for gambling purposes at an entertainment establishment, “N” located in the third floor of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M on February 17, 2009. The Defendant used a pre-tax contract under the name of J, a private document, by granting a forged pre-tax contract to P, who is aware of the fact as described in paragraph 1.

3. The defendant is guilty in collusion with L.