logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.03.26 2012고정2226
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle B factoring.

On September 30, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car on September 22 and 10, 2012, and led to the two-lanes in the Yandong-dong, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Sinsan-si to the half-month park from the side of the Yasan-gu, the Defendant proceeded at approximately 20-30km each hour from the half-month park.

At the time, since it is at night, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes while maintaining a safety distance with the front vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to keep the front door properly and without securing the safety distance, and was negligent in driving at the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driven by the victim C (Nam, 34 years old) who temporarily stopped at the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle due to an unforeseen reason.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim C and the victim E (the 41 year old), who is the seat of the victim’s vehicle, by the foregoing occupational negligence, each of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as base salt, tension, etc., and at the same time damaged the above Orus car to cover KRW 1,381,166 of the repair cost.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a vehicle B factoring.

No owner of an automobile shall operate any automobile on the road which is not covered by the mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the car of the above spectrum, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, as described in the above 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement of traffic accident-related persons C;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2);

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. An accident-related photograph;

arrow