Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around March 30, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the front side of the “Korea Racing Association” located in 14-ro 8-ro 8-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on the ground that the victim C (the age of 46) expressed the Defendant’s desire.

2. On March 30, 2014, around 12:50, the Defendant committed an assault against the Defendant at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), the defect that the Defendant, the head of the police station affiliated with the D District of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo Military Police Station D District, called the Defendant upon receipt of the above C’s report, attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of assault, the Defendant was snicking his ebbbbling, and the Defendant committed an assault against the chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 260 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each selective fine for sentencing (the following extenuating circumstances shall be considered among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. The sentencing guidelines are not applicable as the choice of a fine for reasons of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Although there are unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime and has not been agreed with the victims, the defendant led to his confession of each of the crimes of this case, and the defendant appears to have been sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. in around 2003, while the defendant has been sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the above criminal record is the previous criminal record for more than ten years, and there is no record of gross criminal punishment of suspension of qualifications or more.