(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.11.03 2015고단983

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.11.03 2015고단983

폭행

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant works for the "C School in Chuncheon City B" at the expense of the defendant, and the victim D (38 years of age, female) is a person who is in a legal marital relationship with the married couple on April 28, 2002.

On June 20, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the following grounds: (a) on the part of the Defendant’s house of Switzerland E, 106 Dong 203 around 21:00, on the ground that, under the influence of alcohol, the victim said that “I flickly flicks, var is in the shape,” and “I flick, I am in the shape,” and the victim said that “I flick, I flick, I flick, I flish, and flick, I am in the wall of the victim, and flicked on the floor.”

B. At around 07:00 on November 201, 201, the Defendant found the F apartment house 701 Dong 206, the victim-friendly G, the victim, who did not enter the house during the period of the married couple’s fighting but remains in the friendly house, and the Defendant assaulted the victim’s her knife and the knife at hand.

C. On April 27, 2015, around 19:10, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant on the part of the victim, on the ground that the Defendant reported to the police by taking away the cell phone used in the victim’s hand, which was located in the victim’s hand, and reported to the police by using the telephone phone at the victim’s hand, on the ground that the Defendant’s knife knife knife knife on the end of the victim’s hand knife knife knife on the part of the victim.

2. Each of the above cases is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under paragraph (3) of the same Article.

However, according to the statement on withdrawal of a complaint, it is apparent that the victim withdrawn his intention of punishment by cancelling the complaint against the defendant on June 2, 2015, which was after the indictment of this case. Thus, the indictment of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

참조조문

-형법 제260조 제1항

-형사소송법 제327조 제6호

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2016.10.18 2016고단3106

-수원지방법원 2020.02.04 2019고정1654

-서울북부지방법원 2014.11.05 2014고단1885

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.12.23 2014고정1671

-춘천지방법원 2019.09.10 2019고단820