logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.03.11 2014가단92197
이혼재산분할 소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant shall divide the property on October 10, 2014 with respect to one-half shares of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. According to the purport of each of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including virtual numbers), the plaintiff and the defendant shall complete a marriage report on August 20, 197 and file a divorce report on October 30, 2014 by agreement with the legal couple, and the plaintiff and the defendant shall file a divorce report on October 30, 2014. The plaintiff and the defendant shall file a divorce agreement with respect to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet in the defendant's name (hereinafter referred to as "each of the real estate in this case") on October 10, 2014, and shall be divided into two minutes and one of them shall be deemed to be owned by the plaintiff, and the remainder shall be owned by the defendant (hereinafter referred to as "instant division agreement"). There is no counter-proof.

B. The consultation on the division of property refers to a consultation between the parties who already completed a divorce or between the parties who have not yet been divorced on the division of property, which has been achieved through the cooperation of both parties during the marriage. Accordingly, in the case where the parties who have not yet divorced agree on the divorce by agreement on the division of property under the premise of such agreement, barring any special circumstance, a conditional declaration of intention is made on the condition that the divorce by agreement between the parties would be achieved by agreement between the parties in the future. Thus, where a divorce by agreement is made after the consultation, such agreement shall take effect, unless there are special circumstances.

(1) In light of the above legal principles, the Defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on October 10, 2014, with respect to each of the instant real property on the ground of property division on the ground of property division on October 10, 2014, pursuant to the instant division agreement, with respect to each of the instant real property on the part of the Plaintiff according to the health account and the aforementioned recognition.

2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow