Of the facts charged in the instant case, it is not guilty of violating the Road Traffic Act due to the failure to take measures following the destruction of property.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving C5 tons of MV trucks.

On May 27, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 07:53 on May 27, 2014, and led to the left-hand turn from the direction of the Gerogic Corporation.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving slowly along the center line of the road, using the center inside the intersection and preventing accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left as it is, and instead, went to the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant at the time when he left the left, and was driven by the victim D(34 years of age) who was in the direction of the Crlcheon Industrial Complex from the direction of the Crlcheon Industrial Complex in accordance with the straight line and the left turn signals at the same time.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered from the victim D’s base and tensions in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and suffered from the victim F (37 years of age) who is the passenger of the said EXE-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

2. Parts not guilty;

A. The victims of the Defendant’s assertion did not recognize that the damaged vehicle was damaged by his own vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”).