The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal reveals that the Defendant had no job after being released from the military court due to the past event, and was able to take care of the homeless, B and water collection work, which is the homeless.

The Defendant initially believed that the date of collecting secondhands was the end of B, and collected goods, and prevented the instant crime.

Although the amount of damage is not significant, it is difficult to compensate for damage due to the situation of the defendant.

However, the defendant does not repeat the same number of times when he or she repents his or her wrongness in the truth.

There are many things.

Considering these circumstances, the defendant's request for the so-called "betting" will be made possible to the maximum extent possible.

2. Examining the Defendant’s age, sex, career, family relation, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, crime experience, and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment in light of various circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, even if it is considered that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.