The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized all of his/her crime and reflects it is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by forging a certificate of the balance of a financial institution with high credit in the process of punishing victims suffering from a multi-stage fraud, and the victim will be reinstated.

30,000,000 won is acquired by deception, and the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the course and purpose of the crime, method of the crime, and scale of damage, etc. However, the damage to the crime of this case was not recovered until the judgment of the court. The crime of this case was committed again without among those who had been subject to criminal punishment at least six times (three times in actual punishment, two times in fine, and one time in suspended execution) prior to the crime of this case, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, family environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of this case is unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.