beta
Text
1. The defendant,
A. Each money recorded in the corresponding quoted amount column of the attached list 2 for the plaintiffs as stated in the attached list, and each of the above money.
Reasons
1. The description of the cause of claim is as shown in attached Form 4;
(However, Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (the judgment by service by public notice) regarding the plaintiffs' claims listed in the attached list 2: (2) No. 22 of the year’s “Plaintiff AB” is deemed to be a clerical error in the Plaintiff V.
3. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims listed in the attached list 3
A. In full view of the overall purport of the images and arguments as to Plaintiff C’s evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 4-3, 5, and 8 of the evidence Nos. 4-3, 6, and 7, Plaintiff C incurred damages equivalent to the same amount by transferring KRW 32,50,000 to the Defendant’s employee on May 19, 2016, KRW 13,000,000, KRW 6,500,000 on May 21, 2016, and KRW 25,50,000 on the 27th of the same month, and KRW 32,50,000,000 on the 26th of the same month. However, the details transferred on the Defendant’s website cannot be identified with the number of copies stated therein, and there is no evidence to prove that the total amount of KRW 33,150,00 on the Defendant’s website was insufficient to prove or otherwise, and there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff C’s damage.
B. In full view of the respective types of evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 4-4, 5, and 8 of evidence Nos. 4, 6, and 7, and the overall purport of each of the images and arguments as to Plaintiff D’s evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 4-7, Plaintiff D’s employees KRW 13,00,000 on April 2, 2016 (= KRW 3,500,000 on KRW 3,500,000), and Plaintiff D’s employees KRW 6,50,000 on April 18, 201 (= KRW 3,000,000), and the same year
5. The fact that the sum of KRW 22,00,000 is transferred to KRW 22,00,000,000, which is equivalent to the same amount may be recognized. However, the amount of each transfer from the above account and another agricultural AD account cannot be identified, and each statement on the screen is not sufficient to recognize the fact that Plaintiff D actually paid the amount to the Defendant. Thus, each of the above entries alone is 22,00,000.